Posts

Google_self-driving_car_MountainView2

Google to DOT: We should be able to sell driverless cars if they can pass federal road test

Jennifer van der Kleut

News outlets are reporting that Google executive Chris Urmson sent the U.S. federal government a proposal Friday suggesting that self-driving cars should be legal on public roads, and legal to sell to consumers, if they are able to pass a road test satisfying federal safety standards.

Furthermore, Google’s proposal said the rule, if approved, should apply to any company manufacturing self-driving cars, not just Google.

“Google would rather not wade through government bureaucracy and red tape, so it has penned a proposal that will hopefully allow autonomous vehicles to be federally approved for road use sooner,” Hot Hardware reported Saturday.

“It’s hard to argue with Google’s reasoning,” Hot Hardware writers said, appearing to agree with Google.

This past week, representatives from several top companies such as Google, General Motors, Lyft, Duke University and Delphi Automotive, which are all heavily invested in autonomous car research and development, appeared on Capitol Hill to testify before members of Congress on the merits of the rising technology.

While it appears some progress was made in the meeting, in the same week, a new report from the Department of Transportation made headlines.

In its efforts to create a consistent national policy regarding self-driving cars, the DOT proposed that any self-driving cars on public roads must include a driver’s seat, steering wheel and brake pedal.

This was met with disappointment from Google, whose cars are famously steering wheel-less.

Engadget reports that the proposal was sent in an informal letter to top DOT officials on Friday, but that an official draft proposal has not been submitted to legislators yet.

Nevertheless, Google representative Johnny Luu told the Associated Press that the tech company’s proposal was “the beginning of a process” to create “the right framework that will allow deployment in a safe and timely manner.”

If approved, analysts see the proposed road tests as a “fast-track” approach to getting self-driving cars to market, as opposed to the current, more lengthy process automakers usually have to abide by.

“The typical process for making new rules takes years,” Associated Press reporter Justin Pritchard reports.

There is no word yet on what legislators think of Google’s idea.

“The department will take input from lots of stakeholders as we develop [a] plan,” Gordon Trowbridge, spokesman for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which is overseeing the regulation of self-driving technology within the broader Department of Transportation, told the Associated Press last week.

 

 

 

CapitolConstruct1

Google, GM, Lyft to Testify Before Congress on Importance of Autonomous Car Technology and What Government’s Role Should Be

Jennifer van der Kleut

Executives from some of the biggest names in the autonomous car race will testify on Capitol Hill next week on the importance of autonomous car technology in making driving safer, as well as offer advice on what the government’s role should be in crafting appropriate legislation to help America get there.

According to Reuters, Chris Urmson, the head of Google’s self-driving car project, along with executives from General Motors (GM), Delphi Automotive and ride-hailing app Lyft will be speaking before a Senate committee led by Senator John Thune, a South Dakota Republican that heads the Senate Commerce Committee.

Inverse reports that representatives from two Duke University departments-the Humans and Autonomy Lab and Duke Robotics-will also be joining them at the hearing.

Reuters reports that the committee wants to hear from these company reps on “advancements in autonomous vehicle technology and its anticipated benefits for Americans.”

In addition, the committee wants to hear their thoughts “on the appropriate role of government in promoting innovation, including removing unnecessary hurdles, and their strategy to grow consumer adoption of this new technology.”

U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in January of this year that his goal was for the federal government to remove legislative obstacles to the development of autonomous and connected-car technology, and to develop a consistent national policy for testing within six months.

At the same time, the Obama Administration announced $4 billion in funding for autonomous and connected-car testing along designated corridors nationwide.

For more information about the hearing as well as a link where you can stream the hearing live, visit the Senate committee’s website.

Ford-autonomous-Fusion-test-car

Self-Driving Fords Could Be on Phoenix Roads by Summer

Jennifer van der Kleut

Some may not realize, in addition to racking up miles at Michigan’s Mcity testing ground, Ford Motor Co. has also been logging plenty of miles at another testing ground - the Arizona Proving Ground.

Now, after what they say has been countless hours of successful testing around the Proving Ground, located in Wittman outside Phoenix, media are reporting that self-driving Fords could be ready to hit public roads by this summer.

KPNX 12 News in Phoenix obtained video of a self-driving Ford Fusion navigating real-world road situations at the Proving Ground this week, and posted it on its website.

The video shows “a hands- free safety driver driving seamlessly through various road features thanks to multiple onboard sensors and cameras,” KPNX said.

Ford researcher Jim McBride said Ford is pleased with how all tests have been going, and is confident their cars will be attractive to the public - and, above all, safe.

“Every time I’ve had someone ride in the car,  within five minutes, they’ve completely forgotten that a computer is driving them around,” McBride said to KPNX. “And their next question is, ‘When can I buy one?'”

The Phoenix Business Journal points out that Ford has made a point to test its self-driving cars in extreme conditions, such as ice and snow in Michigan, and now in the sun, heat and dirt of Arizona.

McBride told the Business Journal will head to California next. Ford previously opened a research and development center in Silicon Valley.

“It’s nice to test the car in sunshine, but every place presents unique challenges,” he said. “Eventually we want to drive everywhere, but first we have to go out and map everything. The algorithm development is first.”

McBride also told the Journal that its autonomous car project is close to entering the “advanced development” phase, at which point the company will triple the number of autonomous test cars in its fleet.

McBride said Ford is confident that its car is on track to be available to the public within four to five years-but that safety is important above all else.

“We’re more concerned with safety and the mass market than getting it out first,” he said.

PBdriverless1

Time for Driverless and a Guide for Governments

Burney Simpson

It’s Time for driverless vehicles. And government types just got a helping hand on understanding what’s coming down the pike.

Time magazine this week has a two-part cover story on the promise of driverless vehicles, and it is very positive, “The Increasingly Compelling Case for Why You Shouldn’t Be Allowed to Drive”.

This may be the article you share with friends and family when they ask what the heck it is you work on. But, as of today, the stories were not free online.

The article’s view in a nutshell is, “They’re going to change everything. The economic and safety benefits will be staggering. … Safer, smarter, faster, more comfortable. Why not?”

Much of the material has already been covered but the writing is breezy, informative, and pretty thorough.

There’s the promised benefits of greater safety, reduced deaths and accidents, cuts in congestion, and improved productivity.

On the challenge side there’s licensing questions, the ethical choice of hitting the kid or a wall, the possible end of auto insurance, cybersecurity threats, and data privacy issues.

The second part gets into technology like AndroidAuto and CarPlay and how this is already transforming driving. There’s a graphic on sensors and cameras, a snapshot of Virginia Tech’s testing grounds, and a mention of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) technology.

PRIMER FOR POLITICOS

Parsons Brinckerhoff has released “Driving Towards Driverless: A Guide for Government Agencies” (this links to an intro page with a link to a document pdf).

The guide is brief and free.

It offers a handy, readable introduction to and overview of the industry for public officials. The timing is right considering somewhere around 30 states are looking at the technology in their current legislative sessions (See “Careful Steps on Driverless Laws for Tennessee, Virginia”).

The approach is a big picture view of planning issues that transportation departments and 20-year urban plan writer-types are thinking about.

It is written for government officials, from local to federal, including legislators and staff with DOTs, planning organizations, police, insurance, and so on; in other words all those offices that will be impacted by this coming technology.

Transportation consultants, auto OEMs, suppliers and others on the business side that interact with government could find it helpful as well.

The guide doesn’t get into the latest autonomous technology, connected vehicles, or specific issues like cybersecurity.

PB is a long-time consultant on transportation issues. The author is Lauren Isaac, a PB manager of sustainable transportation based in the firm’s San Francisco office.

Sightstream-16b

Valeo’s Intuitive Driving = Autonomous Driving + Connected Car + HMI: a Q&A with Amine Taleb

Editor’s note: This is another in DT’s series of Q&As with leaders in the automated, connected, and driverless vehicle industry.

ATalebMug1Dr. Amine Taleb is the manager of advanced projects for Valeo’s Comfort and Driving Assistance (CDA) Business Group in North America, where he leads the advanced engineering in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) applications. He has more than 20 years’ experience in advanced technologies with technical expertise in the opto-electronic field. Dr. Taleb graduated from the University of Michigan with a doctorate in Physical Chemistry.  

 Valeo is an automotive supplier dedicated to the reduction of CO2 emissions and to the development of intuitive driving. In 2014, the company generated sales of $16.7 billion. It has 133 production sites, 50 research and development centers and 15 distribution platforms in 29 countries.

Sustainability is a major goal for Valeo. How do you incorporate sustainability in your development of autonomous technology?

Research and development plays a fundamental role in such a goal, by innovating in areas that lead to greener and more efficient mobility. This is why Valeo is focusing its efforts on developing solutions for the reduction of CO2 emissions and pioneering “Intuitive Driving,” which includes autonomous driving as one of its three pillars. The two other pillars are connected car and advanced human-machine interface (HMI). To accomplish this, recruiting the best talent and building a solid expertise foundation are key. In addition, listening to the consumer and partnering with technology leaders, who share common principles, are key towards these goals.

SightstreamCarAValeo in December purchased the German firm peiker, known for its expertise in mobile communications technology. How will this help Valeo as countries build V2V and V2I communications?

The acquisition of peiker is another step on our journey towards the connected car. Peiker is a market leader in automotive telematics connectivity solutions, and coupled with our on-board electronic know-how, it will help us develop innovative vehicle connectivity and telematics solutions. One of the examples in connectivity is V2X, which is gaining more and more traction worldwide, with the U.S. leading the V2V efforts for safety applications. We see V2X as a key element towards the connected and automated car, and also towards smarter mobility. This is very much in line with our vision of Intuitive Driving.

In November you partnered with Capgemini to offer mobility for corporate fleets and car rental firms. Where is this available? How does it work?

Valeo InBlue technology is a vehicle smart-key access system using smartphone technology. One feature is secure virtual key sharing suited for various car-sharing models. Capgemini has an expertise in digital solutions and IT integration that will enable the development of customizable mobility solutions with applications for corporate fleets and car rental.

The InBlue mobility solution will be tested out on a smaller scale with Parcours, a French leasing services company. InBlue is packed with an extensive suite of tools such as vehicle access and start, geo-localization, remote vehicle data access, etc., which will benefit end-users and fleet administrators.

You showcased a number of forward-thinking products at CES 2016. Your Sightstream camera system is designed to replace rear view mirrors. How does Sightstream work? Can this be sold in the U.S. where vehicles must have rear view mirrors? What clients are using the technology?

Sightstream7smallThe Valeo Sightstream camera system relies on the combination of high resolution camera and display to fulfill, to a minimum, the visibility requirements of conventional exterior mirrors. The exterior mounted camera projects the captured rear view scene onto the display located in the interior of the car. Innovations that improve vehicle aerodynamics are one of the keys to achieving the U.S. regulatory fuel efficiency target of 54.5 mpg by 2025. Sightstream enables automakers to improve aerodynamic drag by five percent which improves overall vehicle fuel economy.

Compared to conventional exterior mirrors, Sightstream also provides an enhanced visibility based on its wider field of view, which can potentially lead to the elimination of the blind spot. Other advantages are improved visibility in daytime, nighttime, and even in adverse weather driving. This technology may also increase driver situational awareness when other advanced safety sensors are added.

Rearview mirrors are federally regulated safety devices so any updates to the standards are necessary to allow such technology on the road. The Sightstream camera system utilizes mature technologies already in production. Because of the benefits I have highlighted, and with the maturity of these key components, it is just a matter of time before we would see camera monitoring systems in production cars, potentially as early as 2017 in Europe.

Cruise4U manages steering, accelerating and braking, and it allows drivers to switch between manual and autonomous control. What clients are using this, and when will it be available?

Valeo Cruise4U is a demonstration vehicle that highlights the simple integration of two unique ADAS sensors, namely front camera and Scala laser scanner, which are key building blocks for the sensor fusion architecture of Level 2 and higher automated driving. Both of these sensors are production intent technologies with the Scala to be launched by a major OEM in early 2017. While I am not at liberty to discuss details of any ongoing collaboration we might have with any carmaker, we are a key partner to major OEMs in the development of automated parking and automated driving solutions.

Scala was developed with Ibeo, Mobileye, and IAV. What is Valeo’s approach to partnering with other tech providers?

The Valeo Scala laser scanner provides unique features such as its wide field of view, detection range, high precision in object detection and tracking while driving up to highway speeds. Also, objects in its field of view, moving or not, are classified, thus enabling a precise path planning and maneuver.

The Scala was developed for automotive high-volume OEM applications through our exclusive partnership with Ibeo, a leader in high-tech laser scanner technology for automotive applications. In addition, the front camera, such as the one used on Cruise4U, will take advantage of Mobileye’s EyeQ chip vision technology.

By partnering with IAV, an engineering firm and vehicle integrator, we were able to integrate these advanced sensors in our Cruise4U.

In a very fast moving market, strategic partnerships with world leading companies are essential to effectively build up cutting edge capabilities necessary for autonomous driving technologies.

Your Mobius 2 product also allows for switching from manual to autonomous driving. With Mobius 2 the driver can interact with their tablet or smartphone while in autonomous mode. Is the world ready for this much distraction?

WebviewA-smallOne of the benefits of automated driving is not only to provide safe driving, but also to eliminate the driving boredom of being stuck in a slow-moving traffic or mundane long distance highway driving. Mobius enhances the user experience, while keeping safety in mind. By mirroring the smart device to the instrument cluster during autopilot mode, the driver is able to interact with it using the reconfigurable steering wheel switches. That ensures the driver’s eyes are in the direction of the road and his hands are in proximity of the steering wheel. That allows for a very quick takeover, if requested by the vehicle. That is important, particularly for Level 3 automation.

The Valeo Mobius was tested on a simulator at the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany. Test drivers’ takeover time was measured while interacting with the smart device via the Mobius, versus holding the smart device in their hands while the car was in autopilot. The results have clearly shown that takeover via the Mobius was 500 milliseconds faster than when holding the device in their hands. This could mean life or death at highway speed.

Mobius 2 has a camera monitoring the driver for signs of distraction and fatigue. Has there been pushback from clients/consumers on technology that watches the driver?

WebViewC-smallThe Mobius cockpit concept was subjected to tests by more than 60 end-users during worldwide clinics last year. We have not heard or felt pushback by any of them for having the camera monitoring their distraction or signs of fatigue. On the contrary, and especially in the takeover transition phase from automated to manual, end-users expected to be monitored and validated as capable to take back control of the car. The benefit seen by the driver exceeded the perceived annoyance of being monitored. In our findings, driver monitoring was found to be necessary for the increased trust in automated driving.

Moreover, if we focus on safety benefits of a driver-monitoring camera, in addition to other types of monitoring sensors such as steering wheel sensing in the Mobius, I believe these have an enormous advantage in protecting the driver from being distracted by smartphone and tablet usage while driving in manual mode. Every car should be equipped with such technologies to ensure the “eyes on the road” and “hands on the wheel,” and deter the crashes and fatalities caused by such distractions.

How do you break down doors at auto OEMs that aren’t using your driverless technology?

With our global footprint, and innovation in our DNA, our goal is to be partners with all the major OEMs, as well as emerging ones, in accomplishing autonomous driving. While each OEM might have different strategy towards automated driving, our innovation roadmap allows us to adapt our functions and products for each customer. The Scala is a good example of our strategy as it is the first automotive-grade laser scanner, soon to be on the market for automated driving.

To summarize, the car of tomorrow should be safer, cleaner, and more intelligent, and driving should be more fun and enjoyable. That’s our Intuitive Driving approach.

Thanks Amine.

BikeCar1

Toyota’s Crash Test Bike Braves Autonomous Cars

Burney Simpson

Cyclists are a challenge to driverless vehicles so Toyota has created a crash test bike and rider that mimic the real thing.

Just a month ago the head of one of the largest auto OEMs in the world caused a mini-firestorm when he said bicycles are a pain in the butt for his firm as it develops autonomous vehicles.

“One of the biggest problems is people with bicycles,” Carlos Ghosn, chief of the Renault-Nissan Alliance, told CNBC at the CES 2016 last month. “The car is confused by them because from time-to-time they behave like pedestrians and from time-to-time they behave like cars.”

He concluded, “They don’t respect any rules usually.”

Those issues spurred Toyota engineers at its Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center (TCSRC) to create a crash test bike and bike rider.

Toyota’s bike is shatter-resistant and built in parts that can be quickly fit back together. It is modeled on a 26-inch mountain bike, the most popular type in the U.S., according to Cycling Weekly.

Steve, the pedestrian and cycling crash test dummy, has legs that appear to go around like a cyclists. And Steve has a covering that appears to be human skin to the sensors in autonomous vehicles.

In addition, the bike ‘rides’ on a platform that allows for collisions up to 38 miles-per-hour.

Toyota plans to release media on the test bike and dummy in April at the World Congress of the Society of Automotive  Engineers in Detroit.

Both Renault and Toyota have committed to creating and marketing self-driving cars by 2020.

Toyota is working to have the cars available for the Tokyo Summer Olympics to be held that year. Renault announced it would release its first semi-autonomous car this year, and have a fully autonomous vehicle ready by 2020.

In 2011 Toyota committed $50 million over five years for the TCSRC and has partnered with 16 universities, agencies and research institutions on 26 projects on auto safety research.

Photo of Bicycling on Dearborn Street bike lane, 2012, by Steve Vance.

Auto accident involving two cars

IIHS Study: Automatic Braking and Forward Collision Warning Systems Could Have Prevented 700,000 Crashes in 2013

Jennifer van der Kleut

A new study about the potential benefits of automatic braking asserts that the technology could have prevented a whopping 700,000 rear-end crashes in 2013.

The study, conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and Highway Loss Data Institute using U.S. police-reported crash data, is adding fuel to the fight being waged by countless safety groups, regulators and even some automakers to include automatic braking systems in all future car models.

The study also touches upon the benefit of forward collision warning systems, reporting that the technology reduces crashes by 23 percent.

Crashes are reduced by 40 percent on average in cars that feature automatic braking, the study indicates.

Though front-crash prevention technology is becoming more prevalent, the study reports that in most cases, it is still only being offered as optional equipment.

“That may soon change, however. In September, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and IIHS announced an agreement in principle with automakers to make autobrake standard on all models,” the report reads.

The study also suggests that automatic braking reduces injuries in front crashes.

“The rate of rear-end crashes with injuries decreases by 42 percent with [both] forward collision warning [and] autobrake,” the report said.

“Even when a crash isn’t avoided, systems that have autobrake have a good chance of preventing injuries by reducing the impact speed,” says Jessica Cicchino, the study’s author and IIHS’ vice president for research.

All in all, the study says 700,000 crashes in 2013 could have been avoided with safety technology like forward collision warning systems and automatic braking, which amounts to 13 percent of all police-reported crashes that year.

Still, it seems a slow road toward implementing the technologies widely.

According to Automotive News, “For the 2015 model year, just 1 percent of vehicles included automatic braking as a standard feature, while 26 percent offered it as an option, according to IIHS.”

Ford-Edge-Telescoping-nozzle-RIGHT3

Cleaning Up? – Lens Washer dlhBowles Eyes Growth

Burney Simpson

It’s no secret that much of autonomous driving technology depends on external cameras. So how do you keep the cameras clean of road dirt and other gunk?

One solution — use those nozzles and tubes that already spray fluid to wash windshields. Install them next to the cameras, use the same blue fluid for cleaning, and allow the driver to control the spraying just as they do when they clean their windshields.

Clean and simple.

Last July two firms that supply that cleaning hardware to the auto industry were merged to form a nozzle and tubing powerhouse. Or something like that.

Private equity and venture capital firm Morgenthaler, owner of Bowles Fluidics, purchased that firm’s competitor, the privately-held DLH Industries, and merged them to form dlhBowles.

Bowles was best known for its nozzles, and DLH for its plastic air and fluid handling assemblies, tubes and hoses.

The two had been “fierce competitors” as suppliers to auto OEMs, Tier 1 and 2 suppliers, and in licensing their products, said Jay Bargas, marketing director with the firm. Now, “the playing field is wide open.”

Auto OEMs have been installing cameras on their cars to offer such safety technology as blind spot monitoring, lane departure warning, and heads-up display under the Advanced Driver Assistance Systems rubric.

THE TREND IS YOUR FRIEND

That trend will intensify with National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requirements that all new vehicles under 10,000 pounds manufactured after May 2018 have a rear camera.

Leadership spots in the new dlhBowles were divvied up among the firms’ executives with John Saxon, who had led DLH, named CEO, and Sri Sridhara, a Bowles chief, becoming the new president.

Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Morgenthaler invests in high-value North American manufacturing firms valued between $25 million and $150 million and EBITA over $5 million.

According to PlasticsNews, DLH had annual sales of about $50 million.

More good news — Forbes in December called Ford’s Self-Washing Front/Rear Cameras one of 2016’s hottest new-car features. DlhBowles supplies the camera cleaning system for a number of Ford vehicles, including the 2016 Edge and the 2016 Explorer.

The cameras in the two SUVs allow drivers to see around corners, Forbes claims. “(A)n added twist is that (the cameras) incorporate automatic lens washers to keep the view clear under all climactic circumstance,” according to Forbes.

Head_up_display_technology_experience2

Distracted Drivers – It’s Heads Up or Heads Off

Burney Simpson

Heads Up!

Distracted drivers are grabbing attention in Detroit with Head Up Displays (HUD) and Human Machine Interfaces (HMI) being demoed by the likes of BMW, Continental and Denso International.

Denso is showing a simulated car cockpit that displays warning and safety systems that may one day be installed your car, according to The Globe and Mail. The idea is to help the distracted driver sort through all the bits of information that are coming in, Pat Bassett, Denso VP of research and engineering, tells the paper at the North American International Auto Show.

“We want to make it intuitive without the driver taking their eyes off the road,” said Bassett.

Bassett says his firm is researching driver distractions with MIT, Honda, Subaru, and Jaguar Range Rover in an organization called the Advanced Human Factors Evaluator for Automotive Distraction (AHEAD).

Denso says AHEAD is a global, collaborative effort that will create a toolkit to evaluate the growing number of distractions bedeviling drivers, including voice interfaces, touch screens, HUDs, and multi-function controllers. The toolkit can be used to develop new HMI that are intuitive and safe, according to Denso.

SERIES 7 HUD

BMW has been a technology leader with its Series 7 HUD that displays the vehicle’s speed and the road MPH on the lower part of the windshield. The driver doesn’t need to lower her eyes to the speedometer, so eyes are kept on the road.

BMW recently enlarged the display of the HUD info and put it in color, making it even easier to monitor your speed as you drive 20 miles over the limit past that police cruiser you didn’t notice. This video from last October gives a sense of BMW’s work.

Meanwhile, parts supplier Continental continues to build on its Augmented Reality – Head Up Display that shows vehicle speed, navigation, adaptive cruise control, lane departure warnings, and speed limit warnings.

Events

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria